![]() ![]() All your library information is managed within ‘projects’, which function as catalogs but operate independently from each other.įor example, you might have one project for your vacation photos, another for your best friend’s wedding, and so on. PhotoDirector’s library management tools are a strange blend of excellent and needlessly confusing. They’re already clearly separated, so I found that the blue accents were more of a distraction than a help, although it’s a minor issue. There are some odd choices in the UI design, notably the unnecessary blue highlighting that separates the various elements of the workspace. It also makes it fairly easy to export a file at any stage, whether you want to save it to your computer or upload it to social media. The filmstrip navigation at the bottom is visible throughout all modules along with the associated tagging and rating tools, which makes it easy to keep your images organized throughout the editing process. It’s broken down into a series of modules that are more or less standard for RAW photo editors today, with a couple of extras thrown in: Library, Adjustment, Edit, Layers, Create, and Print. ![]() User Interfaceįor the most part, the PhotoDirector user interface is clean and uncluttered. The Mac version should look similar with only a few small interface variations. Cyberlink PhotoDirector is available for both Windows and Mac, but the screenshots below are from the Windows version. Instead, we’ll look at more general things like the user interface, how it handles your photos, and how capable it is as an editor. Note: PhotoDirector has a range of unique features that provide some interesting options for casual users, but we don’t have room in this review to explore each and every one. Detailed Review of CyberLink PhotoDirector I’m always interested in experimenting with new editing programs, and I bring all of that experience to these reviews to help you decide what’s worth your time.ĭisclaimer: Cyberlink provided me with no compensation or consideration for the writing of this PhotoDirector review, and they have had no editorial control or review of the content before publishing. I first started working with digital imagery in the early 2000s, and since then I’ve worked with everything from open-source editors to industry-standard software suites. Hi, my name is Thomas Boldt, and I’ve worked with a wide range of image editing programs over the course of my work as a graphic designer and professional photographer. Why Trust Me for This PhotoDirector Review? Reasons Behind My PhotoDirector Ratings.Detailed Review of CyberLink PhotoDirector.Why Trust Me for This PhotoDirector Review?.It offers plenty of opportunity to learn and grow, and is bursting with new, useful features for all users. But it doesn't leave behind cat video fanatics who shoot vertical videos with their smartphone. CyberLink seeks to simplify and make accessible cutting-edge video editing technologies like 360-degree video editing and advanced masking, so that prosumers and even semipros get a variety of ways to make their movies shine. Bottom lineĬyberLink PowerDirector 15 Ultra is a fully loaded Windows-based video editor with everything you need to create a movie - from basic to special-effects masterpiece. That mirrors the app's responsiveness to commands throughout the interface and its overall smooth and stable operation. This CyberLink package was among the fastest performers in the group, racing through 60 fps encoding at 3:07 and coming in second for 30 fps at 1:58. We timed rendering at both 60 frames per second and 30 fps. I combined five clips into a 2.5-minute video shot at 60 frames per second and rendered the projects to MPEG 4 at 720p. ![]() Its 64-bit Intel Core i5 processor with a 5200U CPU runs at 2.2 GHz on an HD Graphics 5500 system with 8GB of RAM. I tested PowerDirector on an HP Spectre x360 laptop running Windows 10 Home. It may look a little busy at first, but CyberLink PowerDirector's expertly organized interface is intuitive.ĬyberLink was among the fastest performers in our roundup, racing through 60 fps encoding and coming in second for 30 fps. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |